Logo

RedHat OpenShift vs. Google Kubernetes Engine

February 07, 2022

RedHat OpenShift vs. Google Kubernetes Engine

Cloud hosting has been the buzz in the world of technology, and Kubernetes has undoubtedly helped businesses drive faster applications at scale. The rise of orchestration tools such as Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) and RedHat OpenShift has made it easier to deploy and manage containerized applications.

In this post, we'll provide a factual comparison between GKE and OpenShift to help businesses identify the best option for their cloud hosting needs.

Ease of Deployment

Both GKE and OpenShift offer a simple and quick deployment of containerized apps on cloud hosting services. GKE leads in terms of ease of deployment, with a straightforward process that requires only a few clicks to get up and running. On the other hand, OpenShift's deployment process is a bit more complex and requires additional configuration.

Winner: Google Kubernetes Engine

Customization

Customization is a critical aspect of cloud hosting, allowing businesses to tailor their infrastructure to meet specific needs. GKE allows users to customize their infrastructure with ease, thanks to its open-source nature. OpenShift also allows for customization, but since it's primarily a RedHat product, it's more geared towards the RedHat ecosystem.

Winner: It's a tie.

Security

Security is a top priority when deploying applications on the cloud. GKE provides top-notch security features, including encryption, network security, and identity and access management. Similarly, OpenShift offers security features that include role-based access control, network policies, and secure multi-tenancy.

Winner: It's a tie.

Scalability

Scalability is key when it comes to cloud hosting, and both platforms offer autoscaling through horizontal pod autoscalers. However, GKE's autoscaler works better with more granular features, and it also supports the creation of custom autoscalers.

Winner: Google Kubernetes Engine

Cost

Pricing is a critical factor when choosing a cloud hosting service. GKE offers a pricing model that's easy to understand, and customers can easily calculate their costs. OpenShift, on the other hand, has a more complex pricing model, making it challenging to estimate and control costs.

Winner: Google Kubernetes Engine

Conclusion

In conclusion, both RedHat OpenShift and Google Kubernetes Engine are great tools for cloud hosting services. If you're looking for an easy to use and cost-friendly option, GKE might be a better fit. However, if you're already using the RedHat ecosystem, OpenShift may offer better customization options.

So, which one will you choose? GKE or OpenShift?

Let us know in the comments section below!

References

© 2023 Flare Compare